[Modern Perspectives on Peripheral Neuropathology].

Recent advances in genetic and antibody testing have limited pathological examination of peripheral nerve specimens. However, when examining peripheral neuropathological findings from a modern perspective, there is often an opportunity to comprehend previously unnoticed observations upon re-examining the same specimen. For example, electron microscopy studies have suggested that the components that distinguish between nodal regions and internodes play a pivotal role in the behavior of macrophages that initiate myelin phagocytosis in the demyelinating form of Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Conversely, some patients previously diagnosed with CIDP were found to possess distinctive mechanisms initiated by autoantibodies against paranodal junction proteins such as neurofascin 155 leading to the emergence of the concept of autoimmune nodopathy. In vasculitis, the roles of neutrophils in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, eosinophils in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and complements in nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy in tissue damage have also been demonstrated when viewed from a modern perspective. Furthermore, mechanisms attributable to predominant small-fiber loss in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis have been clarified at an ultrastructural level.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and HEV antibody status: A case-control study from Lazio, Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have pointed to the possible role of infectious diseases in triggering Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Given the association of Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) with Guillain Barrè syndrome, we conducted a case-control study to determine the possible association of HEV infection with CIDP, analyzing possible risk factors for acquiring HEV infection in both CIDP patients and controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 82 CIDP and 260 from the general population have provided some personal information (demographics, anamnestic data and recognized risk factors for HEV infection) and underwent venipuncture blood sampling for virological assays testing for anti-HEV IgG and IgM with ELISA and RNA-HEV performing RT-PCR. RESULTS: Anti-HEV IgG seropositivity resulted in 32 CIDP patients (39.0%) and in 45 controls (17.3%), indicating a significant association between anti-HEV IgG positivity and CIDP (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.70-5.43, p-value <0.001), but in multivariate logistic regression the only significant associations with anti-HEV positivity were eating pork liver sausages (OR 10.443, 95% CI 2.268-60.12, p-value 0.004) and IVIg/SCIg administration (OR 31.32, 95% CI 7.914-171.7, p-value <0.001). DISCUSSION: The higher prevalence of anti-HEV IgG in CIDP patients than in controls could be justified by chronically administering IVIg/SCIg with a passive acquisition of anti-HEV antibodies. Furthermore, all the 20 CIDP patients who underwent IVIg/SCIg administration reported HEV risk factors, so that they could have acquired the infection. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies in a larger CIDP patient sample in treatment with therapy other than IVIg/SCIg are necessary to rule out the possible confounding effect of IVIg/SCIg.

Autoimmune nodopathy with anti-contactin 1 antibody characterized by cerebellar dysarthria: a case report and literature review.

Background: Autoimmune nodopathy (AN) has emerged as a novel diagnostic category that is pathologically different from classic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Clinical manifestations of AN include sensory or motor neuropathies, sensory ataxia, tremor, and cranial nerve involvement. AN with a serum-positive contactin-1 (CNTN1) antibody usually results in peripheral nerve demyelination. In this study, we reported a rare case of AN with CNTN1 antibodies characterized by the presence of CNTN1 antibodies in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid, which is associated with cerebellar dysarthria. Methods: A 25-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to progressive dysarthria with limb tremors. The patient was initially diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy at a local hospital. Three years after onset, he was admitted to our hospital due to dysarthria, apparent limb tremor, and limb weakness. At that time, he was diagnosed with spinocerebellar ataxia. Eight years post-onset, during his second admission, his condition had notably deteriorated. His dysarthria had evolved to typical distinctive cerebellar characteristics, such as tremor, loud voice, stress, and interrupted articulation. Additionally, he experienced further progression in limb weakness and developed muscle atrophy in the distal limbs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nerve conduction studies (NCS), and autoimmune antibody tests were performed. Results: The results of the NCS suggested severe demyelination and even axonal damage to the peripheral nerves. MRI scans revealed diffuse thickening of bilateral cervical nerve roots, lumbosacral nerve roots, cauda equina nerve, and multiple intercostal nerve root sheath cysts. Furthermore, anti-CNTN1 antibody titers were 1:10 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and 1:100 in the serum. After one round of rituximab treatment, the patient showed significant improvement in limb weakness and dysarthria, and the CSF antibodies turned negative. Conclusion: Apart from peripheral neuropathies, cerebellar dysarthria (central nervous system involvement) should not be ignored in AN patients with CNTN1 antibodies.

Anti-contactin 1 Antibody-associated Membranous Nephropathy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy with Several Autoantibodies.

A 50-year-old man diagnosed with anti-contactin 1 (CNTN1) antibody-associated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) was referred to our department for the evaluation of proteinuria. A kidney biopsy revealed membranous nephropathy (MN). Immunohistochemistry for CNTN1 revealed positive granular staining along the glomerular basement membrane, confirming anti-CNTN1 antibody-associated MN. Immunofluorescence showed a full-house pattern, and several autoantibodies, such as anti-nuclear antibody, anti-double-strand DNA antibody, and anti-cardiolipin antibody, were detected in the patient's serum. Although limited autoantibodies have been investigated in some of the reported cases, a variety of autoantibodies might be produced in anti-CNTN1 antibody-associated CIDP, accompanied by MN.

Physician awareness and understanding of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in Japan: a web-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate potential knowledge gaps between neurologists and non-specialists and identify challenges in the current management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), with a focus on 'early diagnosis' and 'appropriate treatment' for CIDP. DESIGN: A non-interventional, cross-sectional, web-based quantitative survey of physicians working in healthcare clinics or hospitals in Japan. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the Nikkei Business Publications panel from 18 August to 14 September 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Responses from 360 physicians (120 each of internists, orthopaedists and neurologists) were collected. OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses relating to a CIDP hypothetical case and current understanding were assessed to determine awareness, collaboration preferences and diagnosis and treatment decisions. RESULTS: Understanding of CIDP was 90.8% among neurologists, 10.8% among orthopaedists and 13.3% among internists; >80% of orthopaedists and internists answered that neurologists are preferable for treatment. Diagnostic assessment using a hypothetical case showed 95.0% of neurologists, 74.2% of orthopaedists and 72.5% of internists suspected CIDP. Among orthopaedists and internists suspecting CIDP, >70% considered referring to neurology, while ~10% considered continuing treatment without a referral. Among neurologists, 69.4% chose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as first-line treatment and determined effectiveness to be ≤3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedists and internists had lower CIDP awareness compared with neurologists, which may lead to inadequate referrals to neurology. Evaluation of IVIg effectiveness for maintenance therapy occurred earlier than the guideline recommendations (6-12 months), risking premature discontinuation. Improving CIDP knowledge among orthopaedists and internists is critical for better diagnosis and collaboration with neurologists. Neurologists should consider slow and careful evaluation of IVIg maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000048516.

[Modern aspects of diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in children]. / Sovremennye aspekty diagnostiki i lecheniya khronicheskoi vospalitel'noi demieliniziruyushchei polineiropatii u detei.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of demographic, clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological and neuroimaging data and pathogenetic therapy of pediatric patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients (n=30) were observed in a separate structural unit of the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital of the Russian National Research Medical University named after. N.I. Pirogova Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the period from 2006 to 2023. The examination was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society on the Management of CIDP (2021). All patients received immunotherapy, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (n=1), IVIG and glucocorticosteroids (GCS) (n=17, 56.7%), IVIG+GCS+plasmapheresis (n=12, 40.0%). Alternative therapy included cyclophosphamide (n=1), cyclophosphamide followed by mycophenolate mofetil (n=1), rituximab (n=2, 6.6%), azathioprine (n=3), mycophenolate mofetil (n=2, 6.6%). RESULTS: In all patients, there was a significant difference between scores on the MRCss and INCAT functional scales before and after treatment. At the moment, 11/30 (36.6%) patients are in clinical remission and are not receiving pathogenetic therapy. The median duration of remission is 48 months (30-84). The longest remission (84 months) was observed in a patient with the onset of CIDP at the age of 1 year 7 months. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis of CIDP is important, since the disease is potentially curable; early administration of pathogenetic therapy provides a long-term favorable prognosis.

Membrane Proteome-Wide Screening of Autoantibodies in CIDP Using Human Cell Microarray Technology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autoantibody discovery in complex autoimmune diseases is challenging. Diverse successful antigen identification strategies are available, but, so far, have often been unsuccessful, especially in the discovery of protein antigens in which conformational and post-translational modification are critical. Our study assesses the utility of a human membrane and secreted protein microarray technology to detect autoantibodies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). METHODS: A cell microarray consisting of human embryonic kidney-293 cells expressing >5,000 human proteins was used. First, a validation step was performed with 4 serum samples from patients with autoimmune nodopathy (AN) to assess the ability of this technology to detect circulating known autoantibodies. The ability of the cell microarray technology to discover novel IgG autoantibodies was assessed incubating the array with 8 CIDP serum samples. Identified autoantibodies were subsequently validated using cell-based assays (CBAs), ELISA, and/or tissue immunohistochemistry and analyzed in a cohort of CIDP and AN (n = 96) and control (n = 100) samples. RESULTS: Serum anti-contactin-1 and anti-neurofascin-155 were detected by the human cell microarray technology. Nine potentially relevant antigens were found in patients with CIDP without other detectable antibodies; confirmation was possible in six of them: ephrin type-A receptor 7 (EPHA7); potassium-transporting ATPase alpha chain 1 and subunit beta (ATP4A/4B); leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF); and interferon lambda 1, 2, and 3 (IFNL1, IFNL2, IFNL3). Anti-ATP4A/4B and anti-EPHA7 antibodies were detected in patients and controls and considered unrelated to CIDP. Both anti-LIF and anti-IFNL antibodies were found in the same 2 patients and were not detected in any control. Both patients showed the same staining pattern against myelinating fibers of peripheral nerve tissue and of myelinating neuron-Schwann cell cocultures. Clinically relevant correlations could not be established for anti-LIF and anti-IFNL3 antibodies. DISCUSSION: Our work demonstrates the utility of human cell microarray technology to detect known and discover unknown autoantibodies in human serum samples. Despite potential CIDP-associated autoantibodies (anti-LIF and anti-IFNL3) being identified, their clinical and pathogenic relevance needs to be elucidated in bigger cohorts.

Lower extremity peripheral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty in a patient with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A case report.

RATIONALE: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disorder that affects the peripheral nerves, leading to weakness and sensory symptoms. CIDP is a rare disease, and few studies have reported on anesthetic management in patients with this condition, especially the peripheral nerve block (PNB). Therefore, a safe and standardized anesthetic approach remains to be established. This case report aims to address this gap in evidence by documenting our experience with PNB in a patient with CIDP undergoing surgery. It contributes significantly to expanding the range of anesthetic options and enhancing perioperative outcomes for patients with CIDP. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 58-year-old woman diagnosed with CIDP was scheduled to undergo left total knee arthroplasty due to osteonecrosis. We anticipated postoperative pain and aggravation of neurological symptoms. DIAGNOSIS: CIDP. INTERVENTIONS: To manage the postoperative pain, we planned a combination of general anesthesia (GA) and lower extremity PNBs, viz. the tibial and femoral nerve blocks, supplemented with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. An initial dose of fentanyl 50 µg was administered as analgesia. The tibial and femoral nerves were identified using a peripheral nerve stimulator in conjunction with an ultrasonic echo device while the patient was conscious, to minimize the risk of nerve injury. The tibial and femoral nerve blocks were performed with 20 mL of ropivacaine (0.25%) and dexamethasone 2.2 mg, respectively. Subsequently, we administered fentanyl and ketamine and initiated continuous infusion of remifentanil. Thereafter, propofol 120 mg was administered intravenously over a span of 1 minute, followed by continuous infusion at 4 mg/kg/h. Upon confirming loss of consciousness, we induced GA using a supraglottic airway device without using muscle relaxants. For postoperative analgesia, we administered acetaminophen 1000 mg. OUTCOMES: The patient experienced no pain immediately after surgery, and good analgesia was achieved subsequently without worsening of sensory symptoms during rehabilitation. LESSONS: We achieved effective anesthetic management in a patient with CIDP by combining GA with nerve stimulation and ultrasound-guided PNB. It is crucial to devise a personalized anesthesia plan that focuses on the patients' safety and comfort while minimizing risk in patients with CIDP.

Outcome measures in pediatric chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Objective outcome measures in children undergoing treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are lacking. The aim of the study was to record serial grip strength and motor nerve conduction studies to assess interval change. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 16 children (8 females and 8 males; median age, 9.7 years; interquartile range, 6-13 years) with CIDP followed at a tertiary children's hospital from 2013 to 2021. Subjects were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Right and left grip strength measurements were obtained at each clinic visit using a handheld dynamometer. Annual right median motor nerve conduction study data were recorded during the study period. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 2.9 years. Grip strength (right: 0.19 kg/month, p < 0.001; left 0.23 kg/month, p < 0.001) and median F-wave latencies (-0.23/month, p = 0.015) showed significant improvement over time. Akaike information criterion showed time + IVIG frequency <21 days as best fit for grip strength and distal compound muscle action potential amplitude. DISCUSSION: Our study results indicate serial grip strength measurements are a feasible and objective way to assess motor strength improvement in children with CIDP receiving immunotherapy.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) causes progressive or relapsing weakness and numbness of the limbs, which lasts for at least two months. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) could help to reduce symptoms. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and last updated in 2013. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers on 8 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that tested any dose of IVIg versus placebo, plasma exchange, or corticosteroids in people with definite or probable CIDP. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was significant improvement in disability within six weeks after the start of treatment, as determined and defined by the study authors. Our secondary outcomes were change in mean disability score within six weeks, change in muscle strength (Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score) within six weeks, change in mean disability score at 24 weeks or later, frequency of serious adverse events, and frequency of any adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our main outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We included nine RCTs with 372 participants (235 male) from Europe, North America, South America, and Israel. There was low statistical heterogeneity between the trial results, and the overall risk of bias was low for all trials that contributed data to the analysis. Five trials (235 participants) compared IVIg with placebo, one trial (20 participants) compared IVIg with plasma exchange, two trials (72 participants) compared IVIg with prednisolone, and one trial (45 participants) compared IVIg with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). We included one new trial in this update, though it contributed no data to any meta-analyses. IVIg compared with placebo increases the probability of significant improvement in disability within six weeks of the start of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 3.36; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 5 trials, 269 participants; high-certainty evidence). Since each trial used a different disability scale and definition of significant improvement, we were unable to evaluate the clinical relevance of the pooled effect. IVIg compared with placebo improves disability measured on the Rankin scale (0 to 6, lower is better) two to six weeks after the start of treatment (mean difference (MD) -0.26 points, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.05; 3 trials, 90 participants; high-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with placebo probably improves disability measured on the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) scale (1 to 10, lower is better) after 24 weeks (MD 0.80 points, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.37; 1 trial, 117 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and placebo in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.87; 3 trials, 315 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The trial comparing IVIg with plasma exchange reported none of our main outcomes. IVIg compared with prednisolone probably has little or no effect on the probability of significant improvement in disability four weeks after the start of treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.68; 1 trial, 29 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and little or no effect on change in mean disability measured on the Rankin scale (MD 0.21 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61; 1 trial, 24 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and prednisolone in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.69; 1 cross-over trial, 32 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably increases the likelihood of significant improvement in disability two weeks after starting treatment (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.38; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably has little or no effect on change in disability measured on the Rankin scale two weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.63; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or on change in mean disability measured with the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS, 1 to 12, lower is better) 24 weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.03 points, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.97; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The frequency of serious adverse events may be higher with IVIg compared with IVMP (RR 4.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 86.78; 1 trial, 45 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from RCTs shows that IVIg improves disability for at least two to six weeks compared with placebo, with an NNTB of 4. During this period, IVIg probably has similar efficacy to oral prednisolone and IVMP. Further placebo-controlled trials are unlikely to change these conclusions. In one large trial, the benefit of IVIg compared with placebo in terms of improved disability score persisted for 24 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the long-term benefits and harms of IVIg relative to other treatments.

Anti-MAG neuropathy: historical aspects, clinical-pathological correlations, and considerations for future therapeutical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with anti-MAG neuropathy present with distal demyelinating polyneuropathy, IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and elevated titers of anti-MAG antibodies. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews what is known about the clinical presentation, course, pathophysiology, and treatment of anti-MAG neuropathy, with considerations for the design of therapeutic trials. METHODS: A literature review of the medical and scientific literature related to anti-MAG neuropathy, and the design of therapeutic clinical trials in peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: Anti-MAG neuropathy can remain indolent for many years but then enter a progressive phase. Highly elevated antibody titers are diagnostic, but intermediate titers can also occur in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The peripheral nerves can become inexcitable, thereby masking the demyelinating abnormalities. There is good evidence that the anti-MAG antibodies cause neuropathy. Reduction of the autoantibody concentration by agents that target B-cells was reported to result in clinical improvement in case series and uncontrolled trials, but not in controlled clinical trials, probably due to inadequate trial design. CONCLUSION: We propose that therapeutic trials for anti-MAG neuropathy include patients with the typical presentation, some degree of weakness, highly elevated anti-MAG antibody titers, and at least one nerve exhibiting demyelinating range abnormalities. Treatment with one or a combination of anti-B-cell agents would aim at reducing the autoantibody concentration by at least 60%. A trial duration of 2 years may be required to show efficacy. The neuropathy impairment score of the lower extremities (NIS-LL) plus the Lower Limb Function (LLF) score would be a suitable primary outcome measure.

ANTECEDENTES: Pacientes com neuropatia anti-MAG apresentam polineuropatia desmielinizante distal, gamopatia monoclonal IgM e títulos elevados de anticorpos anti-MAG. OBJETIVO: Este artigo revisa o que se sabe sobre a apresentação clínica, curso, fisiopatologia e tratamento da neuropatia anti-MAG, com considerações para o desenho de ensaios terapêuticos. MéTODOS: Revisão bibliográfica da literatura médica e científica relacionada à neuropatia anti-MAG e desenho de ensaios clínicos terapêuticos em neuropatia periférica. RESULTADOS: A neuropatia anti-MAG pode permanecer indolente durante muitos anos, mas depois entra numa fase progressiva. Títulos de anticorpos altamente elevados são diagnósticos, mas títulos intermediários também podem ocorrer na polineuropatia desmielinizante inflamatória crônica (CIDP). Os nervos periféricos podem tornar-se inexcitáveis, mascarando, assim, as anomalias desmielinizantes. Há boas evidências de que os anticorpos anti-MAG causam a neuropatia. Foi relatado que a redução da concentração de autoanticorpos por agentes direcionados às células B resultou em melhora clínica em séries de casos e ensaios não controlados, mas não em ensaios clínicos controlados, provavelmente devido ao desenho inadequado dos ensaios. CONCLUSãO: Propomos que os ensaios terapêuticos para neuropatia anti-MAG incluam pacientes com apresentação típica, algum grau de fraqueza, títulos de anticorpos anti-MAG altamente elevados e pelo menos um nervo exibindo anormalidades na faixa desmielinizante. O tratamento com um ou uma combinação de agentes anticélulas B teria como objetivo reduzir a concentração de autoanticorpos em pelo menos 60%. Pode ser necessária uma duração de ensaio de 2 anos para demonstrar eficácia. A pontuação de comprometimento da neuropatia das extremidades inferiores (NIS-LL) mais a pontuação da função dos membros inferiores (LLF) seria uma medida de resultado primário adequada.

Prevalence, Clinical Profiles, and Prognosis of CIDP in Japanese Nationwide Survey: Analyses of 1,257 Diagnosis-Confirmed Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the current epidemiology, clinical profile, and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) using a nationwide survey in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey using an epidemiologic method established in 2021. Questionnaire sheets were sent to the hospital departments of neurology and pediatric neurology throughout Japan. A primary questionnaire was used to determine the number of patients and their prevalence, and a second questionnaire was used to collect detailed clinical information. RESULTS: The primary survey showed that the estimated number of patients with CIDP was 4,180, with a prevalence of 3.3 per 100,000 persons. In the secondary survey, detailed clinical data were available for 1,257 patients. The male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1, and the median age at onset was 52 years. Typical CIDP was the most frequent subtype (52%), followed by distal (17%) and multifocal/focal CIDP (17%). Initial treatments included immunoglobulin therapy (72%), corticosteroids (15%), and others (13%). Among patients with CIDP, 78% had a progressive/relapsing course, 14% did not respond to first-line treatments, and 18% could not walk independently at the last visit. Among the subtypes, typical CIDP had the most severe disability before treatment (44% of patients could not walk independently). However, they showed a more favorable response to treatment than those with distal or multifocal CIDP. In the subgroup analyses, logistic regression analyses showed that younger age at onset, no muscle atrophy, and abnormal median-normal sural sensory nerve responses were associated with a higher probability of independent walking. DISCUSSION: Our study represents the largest cohort study on CIDP to demonstrate the current epidemiologic and clinical status of CIDP in Japan. Clinical subtypes seem to be associated with different treatment responses and outcomes; therefore, an appropriate treatment strategy according to the pathophysiology of each subtype is required to improve the prognosis of CIDP.

Typical CIDP, distal variant CIDP, and anti-MAG antibody neuropathy: An ultra-high frequency ultrasound comparison of nerve structure.

To date, little is known about the usefulness of ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHF-US, 50-70 MHz) in clinical practice for the diagnosis of dysimmune neuropathies. We present a prospective study aimed at comparing UHF-US alterations of nerves and fascicles in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), distal CIDP (d-CIDP) and anti-MAG neuropathy and their relationships with clinical and electrodiagnostic (EDX) features. 28 patients were included (twelve CIDP, 6 d-CIDP and 10 anti-MAG) and ten healthy controls. Each patient underwent neurological examination, EDX and UHF-US study of median and ulnar nerves bilaterally. UHF-US was reliable in differentiating immune neuropathies from controls when using mean and/or segmental nerve and/or fascicle cross-sectional area (CSA); furthermore, fascicle ratio (fascicle/nerve CSA) was a reliable factor for differentiating d-CIDP from other types of polyneuropathies. The fascicle CSA appears to be more increased in CIDP and its variant than in anti-MAG neuropathy. UHF-US offers information beyond simple nerve CSA and allows for a better characterization of the different forms of dysimmune neuropathies.

A study on the role of serum uric acid in differentiating acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy from acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical symptoms and laboratory indices for acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), a variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome, and acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (A-CIDP) were analyzed to identify factors that could contribute to early differential diagnosis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 44 AIDP and 44 A-CIDP patients looking for any demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations or laboratory parameters that might differentiate AIDP from acutely presenting CIDP. RESULTS: In Guillain-Barré syndrome patients (N = 63), 69.84% (N = 44) were classified as having AIDP, 19.05% (N = 12) were found to have acute motor axonal neuropathy, 6.35% (N = 4) were found to have acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy, and 4.76% (N = 3) were found to have Miller Fisher syndrome. Serum uric acid (UA) was higher in A-CIDP patients (329.55 ± 72.23 µmol/L) than in AIDP patients (221.08 ± 71.32 µmol/L) (p = 0.000). Receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated that the optimal UA cutoff was 283.50 µmol/L. Above this level, patients were more likely to present A-CIDP than AIDP (specificity 81.80%, sensitivity 81.80%). During the follow-up process, serum samples were effectively collected from 19 AIDP patients during the rehabilitation phase and 28 A-CIDP patients during the remission stage, and it was found that UA levels were significantly increased in A-CIDP (remission) (298.9 ± 90.39 µmol/L) compared with AIDP (rehabilitation) (220.1 ± 108.2 µmol/L, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that serum UA level can help to differentiate AIDP from A-CIDP with high specificity and sensitivity, which is helpful for early diagnosis and guidance of treatment.

Low-dose rituximab treatment in a patient with anti-neurofascin-155 IgG4 autoimmune nodopathy.

Autoimmune nodopathy is a new entity of immune-mediated neuropathies associated with antibodies against nodal-paranodal epitopes. We present a detailed clinical and serological work-up of a patient with autoimmune nodopathy with anti-neurofascin-155 (anti-NF-155) IgG4 antibodies who was treated with low-dose (500 mg) rituximab, which led to a decrease of anti-NF-155 antibody titer, depletion of B cells, normalization of the levels of neurofilament light chain in serum, and significant clinical improvement. This case suggests that a low-dose rituximab could be as effective as previously reported much higher doses, and presumably with a lower risk of adverse effects and infections.

Impact of 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society diagnostic criteria on diagnosis and therapy of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy variants.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are different criteria for the diagnosis of different variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). The 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) guidelines provide specific clinical criteria for each CIDP variant even if their therapeutical impact has not been investigated. METHODS: We applied the clinical criteria for CIDP variants of the 2021 EAN/PNS guidelines to 369 patients included in the Italian CIDP database who fulfilled the 2021 EAN/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP. RESULTS: According to the 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria, 245 patients achieved a clinical diagnosis of typical CIDP or CIDP variant (66%). We identified 106 patients with typical CIDP (29%), 62 distal CIDP (17%), 28 multifocal or focal CIDP (7%), four sensory CIDP (1%), 27 sensory-predominant CIDP (7%), 10 motor CIDP (3%), and eight motor-predominant CIDP (2%). Patients with multifocal, distal, and sensory CIDP had milder impairment and symptoms. Patients with multifocal CIDP had less frequently reduced conduction velocity and prolonged F-wave latency and had lower levels of cerebrospinal fluid protein. Patients with distal CIDP more frequently had reduced distal compound muscle action potentials. Patients with motor CIDP did not improve after steroid therapy, whereas those with motor-predominant CIDP did. None of the patients with sensory CIDP responded to steroids, whereas most of those with sensory-predominant CIDP did. CONCLUSIONS: The 2021 EAN/PNS criteria for CIDP allow a better characterization of CIDP variants, permitting their distinction from typical CIDP and more appropriate treatment for patients.

Association of the neonatal Fc receptor promoter variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism with immunoglobulin response in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease with humoral and cellular autoimmunity causing demyelination of peripheral nerves, commonly treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), encoded by the FCGRT gene, prevents the degradation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by recycling circulating IgG. A variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the promoter region of the FCGRT gene is associated with different expression levels of mRNA and protein. Thus, patients with genotypes associated with relatively low FcRn expression may show a poorer treatment response to IVIg due to increased IVIg degradation. METHODS: VNTR genotypes were analyzed in 144 patients with CIDP. Patients' clinical data, including neurological scores and treatment data, were collected as part of the Immune-Mediated Neuropathies Biobank registry. RESULTS: Most patients (n = 124, 86%) were VNTR 3/3 homozygotes, and 20 patients (14%) were VNTR 2/3 heterozygotes. Both VNTR 3/3 and VNTR 2/3 genotype groups showed no difference in clinical disability and immunoglobulin dosage. However, patients with a VNTR 2 allele were more likely to receive subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIg) than patients homozygous for the VNTR 3 allele (25% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to receive second-line therapy (75% vs. 54%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The VNTR 2/3 genotype is associated with the administration of SCIg, possibly reflecting a greater benefit from SCIg due to more constant immunoglobulin levels without lower IVIg levels between the treatment circles. Also, the greater need for second-line treatment in VNTR 2/3 patients could be an indirect sign of a lower response to immunoglobulins.

Neuromuscular ultrasound in combination with nerve conduction studies helps identify inflammatory motor neuropathies from lower motor neuron syndromes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identifying patients with inflammatory motor neuropathies (IMNs) is warranted since effective treatments are available and the prognosis of these patients differs from that of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. METHODS: Between January 2019 and May 2022, 102 consecutive treatment-naïve lower motor neuron syndrome (LMNS) patients were recruited; these patients were suspected of having multifocal motor neuropathy, pure motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with initial lower motor neuron presentation. Neuromuscular ultrasound (US) and nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were conducted at baseline. Relevant diagnostic investigations were performed if clinically warranted. The proposed US evidence of IMN was as follows: (i) nerve enlargement at ≥1 of the predetermined sites or (ii) absence of high intensity fasciculations in predefined muscle groups. Final diagnoses were made by experienced physicians after a prolonged follow-up period (≥12 months). IMN patients were defined as LMNS patients who experienced convincing improvements in response to immunotherapies. IMN patients without electrodiagnostic demyelinating features were diagnosed with treatment-responsive LMNS (TR-LMNS). RESULTS: In total, 16 patients were classified as IMN, including nine chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/multifocal motor neuropathy patients and seven TR-LMNS patients. Six TR-LMNS patients were identified by neuromuscular US. The sensitivity and specificity of NCSs, nerve US and muscle US were 56.3% and 100%, 43.8% and 90.7% and 68.8% and 97.7%, respectively. When these three modalities were combined, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.8% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neuromuscular US studies are supplementary modalities to NCSs, and the combined use of these techniques might improve the identification of IMNs in LMNS patients.

Anti-pan-neurofascin nodopathy: cause of fulminant neuropathy.

Autoimmune nodopathies are inflammatory diseases of the peripheral nervous system with clinical and neurophysiological peculiar characteristics. In this nosological category, we find patients with autoantibodies against Neurofascin 140/186 and 155, Contactin1, and Caspr1 directed precisely towards nodal and paranodal structures. These antibodies are extremely rare and cause severe clinical symptoms. We describe the clinical case of a patient with autoimmune nodopathy caused by the coexistence of anti-neurofascin (NF) 186/140 and 155, characterized by progressive weakness in all limbs leading to tetraplegia, involving cranial nerves, and respiratory insufficiency. Response to first-line treatments was good followed by rapid dramatic clinical relapse. There are few reported cases of anti-pan NF neuropathy in the literature, and they present a clinical phenotype similar to our patient. In these cases, early recognition of clinical red flags of nodopathies and serial neurophysiological studies can facilitate the diagnosis. However, the severe clinical relapse suggests a possible early use of immunosuppressive therapies for this rare category of patients.